Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
ISSN (Online): 2454-1680

OncoExpert

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ONCOLOGY

An Official Publication Of Society Of Pharmaceutical Science & Research
Categories Menu

Volume 5 (2019) - Issue 1, Jan-Jun

Research Articles

 
Title
Views
PDF
Cited
1.

CONCOMITANT CHEMORADIATION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA CERVIX: COMPARING DOUBLET VERSUS SINGLE AGENT CHEMOTHERAPY.

Abstract Purpose: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of two definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules (doublet combination and single agent) along with radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the management of locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix (LACCx). Material and method: Previously untreated, 60 patients of LACCx (FIGO stage IIB-IIIB) were taken for definitive treatment by concurrent chemo-radiation. These patients were randomly assigned either; Study group I, the Doublet chemotherapy(Gemcitabine + Cisplatin) administration and Control group II, the Single-agent chemotherapy(Cisplatin) administration group. EBRT was given as 50Gy/ 25Fr/ 5 weeks. Chemoradiation was followed by weekly HDR Intra-cavitory brachytherapy (ICBT), 3 sessions of 700cGy each. Observations were made at the end of treatment and 6 months of follow up. Response to treatment and toxicity were investigated. Results: At the end of treatment, disease response in study and control respectively at the end of treatment was as follows: Stage IIB (CR- 52.63% versus 38.09%), Stage IIIA (CR- 100% versus 100%) and Stage IIIB (CR- 55.56% versus 25.0%). Overall disease response for the group I and II, at the end of sixth months follow up was as follows: CR- 93.33% versus 83.33%, PR- 3.33% versus 13.33%, and recurrence- 3.33% versus 3.33% respectively. Most severe acute hematological toxicity observed was Grade 2 in 40.0% versus 16.67% patients, respectively. Similar was the trend of acute skin & mucosal reactions and acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Though a higher number of patients in the study group experienced more acute toxicities, these were acceptable and manageable. Skin and mucosal reactions at 6 months follow up were not significantly higher in the doublet group compared to the single agent group. Conclusion: Administration of doublet combination chemotherapy; is better compared to single-agent chemotherapy administration in terms of disease control (though not statistically significant)with manageable toxicity profile; given concurrent with EBRT, for management of locally advanced carcinoma cervix. A larger study may establish the very role of the new regimen, especially in a resource-limited setup where patients present with advanced/ bulky...

Vikas Gupta, Ashok K. Chauhan, Paramjeet Kaur, Yashpal Verma, Anil Khurana, Om Parkash

Dr. Yashpal Verma, Additional Senior Medical Officer, Department of Radiation Oncology, PGIMS Rohtak (India).

DOI:

01-07

392

163

0

Case study

 
Title
Views
PDF
Cited
2.

BREAST NODULAR HIDRADENOMA, A DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER

Abstract Nodular hidradenoma or clear cell hidradenoma is a rare skin adnexal tumor arising from eccrine sweat glands. Skin adnexal tumors situated in breast parenchyma are very rare and is one of differential diagnosis of breast masses. We report a case of 60 years old female with a left breast lump and bloody nipple discharge being suspected as a malignant breast mass. A final diagnosis of nodular hidradenoma breast was made after excision biopsy and immunohistochemistry study. A patient is a diagnosed case of carcinoma endometrium and underwent panhysterectomy in 2007. Postoperative histopathology revealed well-differentiated endometrial adenocarcinoma without invasion of the myometrium. She received postoperative radiation therapy and intravaginal brachytherapy in 2008 and is on regular follow-up since...

Mitanshu Sharma, Surendra Kumar Saini, Jitesh Sarvaiya, Pritesh Patel, Monika Vaghela

Surendra Kumar Saini, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, M P Shah Medical College & Associated G G Govt. Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat (INDIA)

DOI:

08-10

395

165

0